But in quite as clear a one came the previous reply, I would prefer not to.

But misery hides aloof so we deem that misery there is none. While of other law-copyists I might write the complete life, of Bartleby. It suggests that Bartleby may be the embodiment of the narrator’s nostalgia for the by-gone period in which independent artisans enjoyed freedom in their workplace. Herman Melville, Bartleby, the Scrivener Ah, happiness courts the light so we deem the world is gay. This analysis will indicate that he (or Melville) is resisting the growth of business organization in the nineteenth century America. Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street by Herman Melville was an interesting story of a scrivener, while the movie was about a public records filer. Four essential elements of organization―clearly defined (organizational) goals, members, a structured system hierarchy, and communication―are used to analyze the circumstances in which Bartleby uses the expression. Using organizational theories, however, this paper tries to prove that Bartleby is mainly resisting the organizational system that was becoming the main feature of American business starting in the mid-nineteenth century. This paper engages with Herman Melvilles short story Bartleby the Scrivener, as well as contemporary discussions thereof, so as to consider a peculiar. The movement views Bartleby as the symbol of hatred of capitalism. Bartleby, the Scrivener (1853) is a story of passive resistance. Recently, Bartleby became the central figure of the Occupy Wall Street Movement. Always polite, never aggressive, Bartleby says I would prefer not to to an ever-increasing range of things as the story progresses. I would prefer not to.You will notI prefer not. This paper focuses on the well-known enigmatic but key expression “I prefer not to,” which Bartleby repeatedly uses in Herman Melville’s short story, “Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street.” The expression has been interpreted as resistance, but against what Bartleby is resisting has long been discussed without producing a consensus.

Bartleby the scrivener i prefer not to